Post by account_disabled on Mar 9, 2024 5:06:52 GMT -5
A Facebook status from last week prompted me to synchronize my watch with Albania today to watch the show "In Peter Pan's Trap" with a glimmer of hope that it would improve. I wanted to see the little boy who has become a social media personality. They call him Jason, but they call him "Taramele" since the child does not clearly articulate the consonant K. Meanwhile, I also researched on YouTube and found that Jason has expressed that he does not like being called that, but the presenter asks him to accept this epithet since the candies are sweet.
And little Jason agrees to call Cambodia Telegram Number Data Taramele. (normally the minor is easily persuaded by a public figure he sympathizes with). They laughed at this fact, from the presenter to a large part of the audience. I am convinced that as I am critical, there are others who do not approve of mockery or bullying even when they are sold to us as humor or stage normality. In addition to the incorrect way of conceptualizing it from a psycho-educational point of view, in this program there are some public behaviors that do not stand and that, in my opinion, should not be reinforced further.
Identifying someone with an articulation problem (even if it is temporary as in the case in question due to the young age) and attaching epithets, labels, etc. is not acceptable not only in public, but also in narrower environments private. It is the same as telling a person who cannot see well enough to be blind, another who has an underdeveloped leg bone - clumsy or lame, etc examples. Differentiating one child among others is not acceptable. Other children do not feel good when someone is treated as a "star" in the middle of the stage, or receives special attention from the presenter and the guests, while the other children are just a panel sitting on the bench waiting for the articulation of questions.
And little Jason agrees to call Cambodia Telegram Number Data Taramele. (normally the minor is easily persuaded by a public figure he sympathizes with). They laughed at this fact, from the presenter to a large part of the audience. I am convinced that as I am critical, there are others who do not approve of mockery or bullying even when they are sold to us as humor or stage normality. In addition to the incorrect way of conceptualizing it from a psycho-educational point of view, in this program there are some public behaviors that do not stand and that, in my opinion, should not be reinforced further.
Identifying someone with an articulation problem (even if it is temporary as in the case in question due to the young age) and attaching epithets, labels, etc. is not acceptable not only in public, but also in narrower environments private. It is the same as telling a person who cannot see well enough to be blind, another who has an underdeveloped leg bone - clumsy or lame, etc examples. Differentiating one child among others is not acceptable. Other children do not feel good when someone is treated as a "star" in the middle of the stage, or receives special attention from the presenter and the guests, while the other children are just a panel sitting on the bench waiting for the articulation of questions.
